Now Playing Tracks

The Lesson of Charles Stuart

Today the Church commemorates Charles Stuart, King of England (1625-1649), who was executed by Oliver Cromwell’s Puritans on this date, rather than converting to Presbyterianism and abandoning the Catholic tradition of the Church of England.

image

Some folks commemorate him as a martyr, but I have a bit more of a love-hate relationship with him.

  • Do I think he was a good king? 
  • Definitely not. By all accounts, he could be arrogant and a bit of a prick.
  • Could he have ruled better and not lost his head?
    Without a doubt.
  • Do I believe in the divine right of kings, as St. Charlie did? 
    Sort of, even if not as vehemently.
  • Is there ever justification for killing a king, even a bad one?
    Nope.
  • Am I glad that the Anglican Church has a strong Catholic heritage, and not just an extreme Protestant one?
    Certainly.

At the altar this morning, I struggled with the notion of Charles the Martyr. Did I really want to celebrate his life and example? In the end, I used the second, alternative collect for a martyr:

O God, who didst bestow upon thy Saints such marvellous virtue, that they were able to stand fast, and have the victory against the world, the flesh, and the devil; Grant that we, who now commemorate thy ‘Martyr’ [it was hard to subtly get the right inflection for the air-quotes] Charles Stuart, may ever rejoice in their fellowship and also be enabled by thy grace to fight the good fight of faith and lay hold upon eternal life; through our Lord Jesus Christ, who with thee and the Holy Spirit liveth and reigneth, one God, world without end.

When it all comes down to it, I think Charles Stuart is more of a negative example than a positive one. His legacy is a reminder that just because you’re right, doesn’t mean you’re not being a dick. And that’s a sentiment we could all stand to be reminded of from time to time.

blog comments powered by Disqus

1 note

  1. jondrowe posted this
We make Tumblr themes